Vampire Hunter D

Overview: Time to look at a 1985 classic that made a huge impact on the popularity of anime in the US. It is the height of the Cold War and Reagan is in the White house. This was before Akira and Ghost in the Shell and besides Speed Racer and Astro Boy, Americans had no idea what anime was. All of a sudden we Americans see a cartoon with ultra violence, tits, and crazy steampunk nonsense that is never explained. We take one look at this incoherent acid trip and go...FUCK THIS IS AWESOME! This was the birth of the teen and older anime community in the United States. This is Vampire FUCKING D! Plot and characters: 5/10 The plot is that 10,000 years the future, vampires have taken over the world and human civilization is a mixed up mess of modern technology and 1800s Romanian peasantry. Why? Who the fuck cares!? This is Vampire Hunter D, we don't need no stinkin logic! A powerful vampire lord called Count Lee in reference to Christopher Lee is terrorizing the countryside. A half human half vampire of noble vampire birth has decided to side with the humans and take down the vampires. The plot and cheesy voice acting will immediately remind the viewer of the Castlevania games and especially Symphony of the Night. However, this was actually made before the original Castlevania on NES and actually helped inspire the Castlevania series! One bizarre but funny thing in this film is that D also has a hand with a mouth that eats things (now we know where Deidara gets it), but unlike Deidara's, this hand never shuts the fuck up. D at one point even has to threaten to cut it off if it won't stop talking! In the end, D rescues the damsel of course, kills Dracula/Lee and the castle crumbles exactly like in the end of every Castlevania game. Actually the design of the castle as seen from the outside in Symphony of the Night is based on the castle in this movie! Art and sound: 5/10 The art was decent for the mid 1980s and there wasn't really a high standard for anime at the time. It looked better than any anime Americans had ever seen to that point, so keep that in mind when watching this from a modern perspective. Saying the animation sucks is like watching Fritz Lang's Metropolis or Sergei Eisenstein's Alexander Nevsky and saying the special effects suck. It simply isn't helpful to compare to modern standards and you have to appreciate how great it looked relative to its own time. Overall: 6/10 Don't expect amazing story telling or character depth, but this is a must see for people that want to learn more about anime history and for fans of Castlevania! It is nostalgic, cheesy, and a fun way to spend a boring, rainy afternoon.

Title: Vampire Hunter D Novels, Manga, Anime: Vampire Hunter D was originally a series of seventeen novels written by Hideyuki Kikuchi and illustrated by Yoshitaka Amano (famous for his work on character designs and the logos for the Final Fantasy series) starting in 1983. Vampire Hunter D was adapted into two separate media; manga and comics. The manga was an adaptation in which Kikuchi hand-picked the artist, Saiko Takaki, began running in 2007, was licensed Stateside by Digital Media Publishing, and is currently ongoing. The comic, whose rights were acquired Devil's Due Publishing (the parent company of Digital Media Publishing) in July 2008, is known as Vampire Hunter D: American Wasteland, and will be written by Jimmy Palimotti (known for writing the Sci-Fi series Painkiller Jane and work on Monolith). Vampire Hunter D, an 80 minute movie, was produced by Ashi Productions (known for their work on the Sailor Moon S and SuperS movies) and directed by Toyoo Ashida (famous for his work on... well, there's nothing really to speak of here). It was released in 1985 in Japan and licensed Stateside by, in order, CBS Theatrical Films, MGM, Streamline Pictures, and, the current holder of the license, Urban Vision Entertainment. Story: Doris Lang, the daughter of a werewolf hunter, is out hunting werewolves one night when she is bitten by Count Magnus Lee, who then decides to make her his bride, marking her with his bite marks. She hires a vampire hunter known only as D, who she meets out in the middle of nowhere one day, offering him food and herself to take out the Count and save her from becoming his bride. ...Where to begin with this? This story is all over the place. I mean, there's a general narrative here, and it's something resembling coherent when it's looked at overarchingly. In execution, however, it is made of WTF. There are sudden jumps from scene to scene, subplots are bought in out of nowhere, and twists are thrown around like they're candy, with all of this having little to no explanation whatsoever. Moreover, the thing just drags, with scenes seemingly added simply for the point of drawing out the movie, which really shouldn't have happened. I honestly can't tell you what the hell happened here. I was watching this with my anime club tonight, and we just gave up on even trying to understand what happened about a half hour in and just started mocking it mercilessly. Art: For the 80s, this is halfway decent. The character designs are extremely pointy and detailed, but they're based off of Amano designs, which explains a lot. However, it has not aged well. Action scenes are done mainly with pulsating lines in the background, not to mention flashing lights that could probably induce epileptic seizures in those susceptible to them. The movie's extremely heavy on the gore, but the way that blood works in this is incredibly stylized and not even close to reality in the slightest. Characters' color palettes will change from scene to scene, far more than lighting should account for. Most notably, the hat that D wears creates a black void in the upper part of his face with only his eyes showing, and it's incredibly painful to watch, especially when it doesn't move even when the lighting does. There is some nudity in here, however, it's not really all that well done, and it's paired with images of death and gore and such that I'm sure that, by the process of association, if you showed this to kids, they could very easily never ever ever want to have sex ever. Music: Meh. I didn't notice this much, but it didn't make that much of an impression on me, either. So, we'll say passable. Seiyuu: As with the music, I didn't notice them that much, but neither did they make that much of an impression on me, so, again, we'll say passable. Length: This movie just dragged on and on and on; it should've ended at the hour mark, and a good deal of the "twists" could've been cut out, and it would've been semi-decent. Overall: Don't watch this. It's not worth it, except for mocking purposes. Story: 4/10 Art: 4/10 Music: 6/10 Seiyuu: 6/10 Length: 5/10 Overall: 25/50; 50% (F)

I own every Vampire Hunter D light novel. I've read all of them at least three times (it's really easy they're only about 200 pages) So when I saw this movie I spent a good portion of my time going ".......what?" Story: The story is ok. I felt they spent too much time focusing on the story when it would have been much better for them to use the story to transition the action scenes. They make it a little less complicated than the book, but not to the point where it really detracted from it. Art: The art is VERY old-school. You have to get over that very quickly or else you're not going to enjoy this anime at all. That old-style seemed so uninspired to me, it wasn't trying to be incredibly original and it wasn't. Sound: With the old-school art comes the old-school sound effects..again get used to them. I can't say that I enjoyed the music, but that would mostly be because...it's old, it didn't stick into my mind at all as to what it could have been. Characters: This is where this anime falls incredibly short. Every single character is a stereotype. You have D, the most incredibly powerful vampire-hunter on the face of the planet...and you really know it. He never seems to struggle and in every battle you know he's going to win. Magnus Lee...what can I say about him? I watched the dub...because it was the only one available to me and they just tried to make him the image of Dracula. But my biggest concern was Doris Lee. In the novel she's a powerful woman, she kills monsters too and she does a great job of looking out for herself and her brother. In the movie they make her dependant and very weak, no character for her at all. Overall: Watch this for the experience. If you've been watching only recent anime, stuff from the last 2-3 years...watch Vampire Hunter D and appreciate how far along this art work has come. After you've watched this, watch Bloodlust.

Along with Akira, Vampire Hunter D is one of those old anime titles where its popularity is based pretty much on one thing and that's nostalgia. When nostalgia runs wild it can definitely cloud one's honest judgment. However, Vampire Hunter D does a decent enough job backing up why it's an entertaining film; but to claim it as one of, or even the greatest of all time in terms of sheer quality are heavy exaggerations and thrusts one towards complete madness. The works of Miyazaki and Satoshi Kon are tough as hell to compete against and this is more of a fact than opinion. The movie does have one big thing going for it which is style. I like the mix of sci-fi with the classical Transylvania setting; to include the monsters and flesh eating beast that roam the country sides devouring live stock adds to the horror like feel. The plot is well paced and the movie accomplishes what it sets out to deliver, which is a solid action romp well utilizing its horror setting. Vampire Hunter D does have its problems though, in which the fans of it love to ignore with a smile; such as undeveloped characters and plot holes big enough to fit the moon through. D is a cool character that screams for more background, but this really isn't a gripe for me any longer because the mystery actually works here for him. However, the characters fill typical vampire roles even for that time, but Count Magnus Lee overshadows D because I like his drive. His craving just seems too realistic. I will go ahead and refrain from detailed plot issues as not to ruin the movie for those whom haven't seen it. Although effective for that time, the animation is dated and I can think of several old titles that still hold up well until now, with Neo Tokyo being one of them. As well as one that pre-dates it by six years, which happens to be Miyazaki's Castle of Cagliostro. To my experience, those whom favor superior visuals first will more than likely walk away hating this movie. The action scenes can range from just barely ok to brutal, with characters sliced in half to fingers being crushed off. I really don't have a problem with the artwork, but I think the BGM is more hit than miss and wasn't always used properly, because at one point I can think of the music was used at the wrong time. One scene that stands out to me happens to be the first appearance of D. While watching him slowly approach on his horse and completely shrouded with mystery. I think the scene would have been more effective with the complete removal of music, with more focus on the sound effects: such as the whistling of the wind, coupled with the slow, eerie plodding of the horses steps. I believe this method would have only enhanced the style of the movie, instead it just had a rather bland feel to it and D really didn't give off an aura as an intimidating figure; but then again that's just me. Vampire Hunter D is a title that will always be a part of my collection. Even though I respect its cult classic status and find some enjoyment in it. I can't shower it with praise because it's a very flawed film that I doubt could make a top 50 anime list of mine or even probably 100. I mainly recommend this to die hard anime fans. However, those whom need top notch visuals first are better off skipping it. Highs: Very good setting, action, lead villain Lows: Plot holes, story issue, most characters have very little depth, dated animation

Exciting, thrilling, mysterious. This rather old movie, is definitely a masterpiece for it's era. Taking into consideration it's age, you simply can't attempt to compare it to mordern animes, by those standards it falls rather short. But, if you judge it according to the standards of the time it was made, you find a fast-paced filled with action and horror that can easily outmatch many horror movies, be it animated or acted. You also find in it many aspects of horror, that are fairly common in movies and series following the same genere. Although to tell the truth, the story had such a fast pace that all the critical scenes didn't have much impact; but at this point one can't do much about so it's best to enjoy it. Visually, it obviously had a very old style of animation, but neverless it was quite appealing according to it's horror genere. Scenes were constanly repeated, but as a necessity rather as of laziness. So mamy chatacters, scenarios, and places were shown in this movie that is one can infer that they would have had a very hard time keeping up with it. The music score, was just as old as the movie itself, but it sucessfully gave it the ambience needed for a a horror movie. Maybe not memorable, but rather enjoyable. And as personal comment, I'm surprised that fanservice and panty shots were already present since then XD

One of the Movies from the 80´s considered as cult and its definetly not your everyday anime to watch, and its SCARY as hell at some points if you are quite familliar with vampire stories.Personaly i choose this over the bloodlust version because i like the oldskool art, unscensored violence and the animation in sketched and books is just brilliant, and for this im looking for the older audience. and D itself was one of anime's all time fav heroe's. The music is sometimes repetitive but it has good opera music with violent scene´s and the best of all: IT WAS FULLY HANDDRAWN!

Without EXTENDED knowledge of the background this anime just happens. Scenes without connection, sentences without weight, action without deep motives. The worst of Berserk outclasses this in about every aspect. Have you seen extremely poor video game/manga adaptation before? No? Look no further this is it. Whom to recommend? Kids? Cannot due to gore and nudity... Young adults? Maybe, but even there, most anime contains far more weight, hype, character. Perhaps with time it was tuned too well with later coming shows, but this anime itself today is unwatchable at best. Do yourself a favor, there are plenty other anime out there. Do not let over the 7 score fool you~ I have not logged in for ages, did so now only to help others to avoid the mistake I did as a horror/anime/gore/mystical/vampire story fan by watching this. I can understand if nothing like this happened before, it may motive others to have an edgy main character, but that's the best that can be said on my part. I am really sorry for having to write this, but it is an honest opinion.

Vampire Hunter D is part of my collection and is also one of my favorites. (I’d go with VHD1: 9.1 VHD2 9.0 for those wondering). The main character, Vampire Hunter D, highlights and stars in this 1985 classic that is set thousands of years in the future where Vampires once ruled man, but now are being slowly erased. The animation is done with very dark brooding colors. Backgrounds in many scenes are just black. The characters even sometimes don dark apparel in the blackness making where you watch it so important if you want to see the 80s anime artwork and character design. This makes it tough to see if you aren’t watching at night with the lights off (my personal recommendation). It really does a great job of setting the mood, however, with creatures coming out of the darkness that have nothing but the cruelest intentions. The sound creates just as much atmosphere as the picture and this one won’t let you down. Some of my all time favorite character voices are Count Magnus Lee and the booming echo of the giant fireball throwing henchman. On occasion there will seem like a missing sound effect or the dialogue will be a little muddled, but overall it does its job supremelely. If you have surround sound or headphones the Three Sisters scene is awesome and really freaky. The music stays steady throughout the movie, and amount to not much at all. It fits right in with the pace of the movie, though, and lets the sound effects create the ambiance. The plot moves along briskly for the most part and never fails to introduce new characters or monsters at every opportunity. The overall lack of diialogue makes the plot second hand to the art and action but a good story is in the movie. There are a couple holes in the plot that are puzzling but nothing at all that will distract from the movie for first time viewers. Without giving up too much info for those that haven’t seen it , D must rescue a beautiful girl in distress. I know, you’ve seen it right? But he’s got to go through a horde of grotesque monsters! Seen that too, huh? Well, this is one of the original animes to do it, so take a look at where some of that got its beginning. It’s well worth it. ~Grifty.

From start to finish this movie is a true miracle. Vampire Hunter D is a movie that if you consider your self a fan of anime you must see to be credible. The monsters, the gore, the story, the atmosphere, the themes, the setting...all done so wonderfully. The art is amazing, though dates, nobody can deny this hand drawn gem. The way shadow is illustrated is so uniwue and japanese you will think your mind is playing tricks on you and hallucinating. The cross hatch work is something that is so hard to replicate. D is a great character too. Watching him interact with this bleak, evil, daunting, and demonic world of the future is so good for some reason. I don't know, maybe it is just a nice shot of the 80s for me when I watch this but it is truly my favorite vampire flick ever. I have seen them all and it is like the ultimate adventure/hammer,george a romero, amano, artistic, syphony of true grit cult horror. Science fiction, post apocolypyic future, horror, adventure, western (in some of the direction surrounding D), and pure classic japenese master swordsman are just a few of the genres this movie reps with authority. I would really challenge anyone to give me a negative point of this movie. The last scene run through the castle is one of the best climaxes in film period. Watch this!

Originally a series of novels about a vampire hunter who is half vampire himself, Vampire Hunter D's first transition to the anime world takes the form of this self-titled OVA from 1985. At the time of writing, the ever reliable Wikipedia describes this OVA as "a cult classic among English-speaking audiences". Amidst the lavishing praise - the effect of which is spoiled somewhat by the clumsy prose - there's a bit which notes that the OVA featured "memorable voice acting performances in both English and Japanese". Now, aside from struggling to recall anyone lauding the original "Vampire Hunter D", I've also watched "Vampire Hunter D" in dub myself, and the only way I would describe that dub as being "memorable" would be to couple it with an adjective synonymous with "shit". Despite being made decades ago, "Vampire Hunter D" manages to look and feel even more ancient than its considerable age. The action sequences comes off as stiff and lacking in fluidity; the colours used are so dark that I could barely tell what was going on sometimes. In addition to the low production quality, "Vampire Hunter D" shows its class with opening scenes featuring a girl running around with a skirt so short that it resembles a handkerchief tied around her waist. This enabled panty shots to be taken with ease from any angle, and, needless to say, we're treated to exactly that. Thankfully, the forthcoming tidal wave of fanservice turned out to be smaller than what the opening scenes suggested, though what fanservice there were felt shoved in with little regards to its impact on the mood and atmosphere. But apart from those occasionally blips, the atmosphere of the "Vampire Hunter D" is actually strong for the most part, and is probably the most competent aspect of the anime. The well selected BGM tracks helped; the atrocious English dub didn't. As an anime adapted from an established franchise, "Vampire Hunter D" feels like it's more aimed towards an existing audience. To someone like me who knew (and who still knows) next to nothing about the franchise, the anime feels incomplete. "Vampire Hunter D" clearly has a wealth of backstory regarding the main character D, but not only does this instalment reveal very little of his backstory, it seems almost reluctant to do so. Pity, because what it chose not to tell are what interested me the most. Ironically, the story it tells instead is pretty stale and cliched - especially the romance elements - but still manages to be confusing due to the narrative failing to explain things properly or just deliberately withholding information to keep up the sense of mystery. One of the effects of this is that the motivations of the characters are often unfathomable - I have no idea what they're fighting for half the time. And to be honest, it's also hard to care too much since all the characters except D himself are rather bland anyway. As for D... it'd be nice if the anime told us ANYTHING about his past instead of just being a gigantic cocktease. Since "Vampire Hunter D" is so tight-assed when it comes to backstory, it's only a prequel in name to the "Vampire Hunter D: Bloodlust" movie which came out in 2000. The reason I bring this up is because that movie is superior to this OVA in just about every way. So if you're interested in the franchise, you could just skip this OVA and go straight onto the movie because, honestly, you're not missing much here. Personal score: -0.5 (mediocre)

VAMPIRE HUNTER D has always been a cult favorite of many Anime fans dating all the way back to what historians would call the "dark days of Anime". Back then, Anime had limited exposure to American audiences, aside from the occasional showing of children's cartoons often mangled and edited. But with the release of Katsuhiro Otomo's controversially violent but nonetheless brilliant AKIRA, an interest in edgy, darkly animated, gritty features from the Land of the Rising Sun was ignited, and so it followed with several titles imported. This low-budget animated direct-to-video feature from 1985 was one of them. Based on a book by renowned Japanese Horror author Hideyuki Kikuchi sporting smoky-hazed illustrations by Yoshitaka Amano (who would later gain cult status for his work on the classic FINAL FANTASY series and later, Neil Gaiman's "The Sandman"),VAMPIRE HUNTER D aimed to be an edgy thriller, a horror movie, and even a love story all rolled in one. That said, critics were not unanimously ecstatic. Reviews were mixed, with most criticisms centered on the somewhat stilted animation or sometimes inconsistent characters. To this day, VAMPIRE HUNTER D has its share of detractors. But it also has its share of devoted fans, many of who had grown up in the West with a dubbed version produced by the late Carl Macek and his company, Streamline Pictures. Set in a post-apocalyptic future where vampires and mutants have overrun a human world, VAMPIRE HUNTER D begins on a dark night with a deftly choreographed action scene. Here we see Doris Lang, a courageous werewolf hunter's daughter stalking her gardens in pursuit of a T-Rex like monster with sharp teeth and scarlet eyes. Chasing it into the forest on horseback, Doris finds herself face to face with an even more imposing threat -- a hulking, shadowy vampire known as Count Magnus Lee. Naturally, the bloodthirsty aristocrat takes a drink from our heroine's jugular vein. The following day, Doris encounters a lone figure on a cyborg horse -- a mysterious cloaked stranger called "D." Desperately, she hires him. The rest of the movie involves D doing everything in his power to slay the evil count to save Doris from an eternal life as a walking undead. Meanwhile, Doris must protect her impulsive little brother, Dan, and fend off the advances of an unwelcome suitor, the arrogant mayor's son Greco. Matters are further complicated when D also has to deal with L'armica, Count Lee's jealous daughter, and the ambitious Rei Ginsei, a deadly noble wanna-be who will do anything to earn his master's favor. During all this, Doris falls madly in love with D -- but it turns out that her rescuer (surprise) is half-vampire himself. (This explains why his left hand has a creepy-looking face that can talk to its master or even suck up nasty creatures.) Despite its promise of multi-threads, VAMPIRE HUNTER D turns out to be a much more simplistic story in execution, even bordering on predictable. Somehow the viewer knows that the lead character is going to triumph in the end in spite of the obstacles he faces in his quest. More problematic to viewers expecting flashy visuals might be the animation. As mentioned, this is a low-budget animated feature, resulting with a cel count that borders on choppiness in places. As such, the dramatic style of Amano's character illustrations loses a lot in the transition to screen. Furthermore, the backgrounds, although dark and appropriately imaginative, lack detail at times. As such, the film can seem visually dated to many viewers. Likewise, the soundtrack shares similar qualities. Although the sound effects are appropriately haunting and scary, at times they do sound cheesy, particularly the synthesizer sound effects when Count Lee sends rays from his eyes. The musical score from TM Network's Tetsuya Komuro is fittingly epic and sometimes spooky, although it is obviously driven by synth instruments from the '80s. Faults aside, VAMPIRE HUNTER D still delivers some entertainment value for viewers willing to overlook such technical shortcomings. In spite of its aforementioned predictability (some might argue this movie was tailor-made for Western audiences), VAMPIRE HUNTER D delves into some complex issues: D's inner struggle to resist his own instincts when Doris makes sexual advances on him and his inability to express his true compassion to others results from some very understandable emotions. It is also intriguing to discover that the villainous Count Lee's actions are motivated mostly by the desire for sport rather than malice, although he still does exude evil in every scene. The action and fight sequences are also skillfully choreographed in the style of a samurai-slasher. It's also important to note that this movie has its share of graphic violence--there are quite a bit of gory sword fights, resulting with stabbing, amputating, or slicing in half. There is also one particularly disgusting moment toward the end where a character's head explodes, exposing his insides. (A character's face is also briefly stabbed in the eye in the subsequent scene.) While all this may sound pretty extreme for squeamish viewers, the cheap production values actually make the violence less gruesome and more campy, making it easier to sit through than most blood fests. There are also a few very inoffensive nude scenes. This is a movie best appreciated by an adult audience; parents should think twice before considering showing this to children. Perhaps it's partially because of this graphic nature that VAMPIRE HUNTER D succeeded in crossover success from its native country of Japan to the West. Dubbed in 1992, Streamline Pictures' release has been a nostalgic favorite for old school Anime fans to this day. Having said that, critics and many fans of the time still staked it with scathing reviews. I at one time appreciated this older dub, but over the years I have grown less and less fond of it. I'm not sure what it was that turned me off from it over the years, but then I figured it out: it sounds dreadfully stiff and stilted. In all fairness, Michael McConnohie, Barbara Goodson, Jeff Winkless, Lara Cody, and Kirk Thornton are all fine voice actors. The problem is that they were saddled into a production that veered on pure cheese and a lot of choppy-sounding dialogue ranging from mundane to laughable. There were also instances when Macek did a bit of tampering with the music, extending Komuro's score longer than usual sometimes sounding out of place with the visuals. Most infamously, the opening scene in which Doris is confronted by the Count has a rather corny "permit me to introduce" myself monologue which not only diluted the mood, it gave a very laughable quality that sadly would be exacerbated by phony Transylvanian accents and even a groan worthy love confession ripped off from THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK (Doris: I love you. D: I know.) The sound quality was quite bad, too, although that may be on the fault of the equipment used at the time, so I wouldn't dock the dub against it. Sentai Filmworks, who rescued this title and gave it an eye-popping remaster, also provided a new dub, while jettisoning the Streamline version for their release. This will likely be a point of contention, as a lot of Streamline titles which received new dubs (AKIRA, CASTLE IN THE SKY, MY NEIGHBOR TOTORO, NADIA: THE SECRET OF BLUE WATER, THE CASTLE OF CAGLIOSTRO, 3x3 EYES) have often been harshly maligned by old school fans, even though some might argue in the cases of some of those films, these newer versions were sorely needed, as a lot of these older dubs hadn't aged well at all. I do have a couple of minor issues regarding Sentai's newer dub, but unlike the Streamline version, this revamp, headed by Matt Greenfield of ADV fame, does a very commendable job of bringing the movie closer to its more serious intent, stripping it of much of the unintentional humor. The script is a fresh new translation of the original Japanese an…

*If you are thinking about watching Bloodlust consider watching this first!* I don't say that because there is any continuity to the movies, there technically isn't as far as i know. But watching this before Bloodlust allows you to get a better sense of the main character D. This is important because fast forward 15 years (real world) to when Bloodlust is made and D is still the same age just doing another job. It's kinda crazy but if you accept the internal logic of the movies, watching both movies (starting with this one) is a better experience than just Bloodlust. In doing so, you can really look at the D movies as episodic adventures in the same story. So, this movie serves to give the viewer some background information on D, that the viewer can then take into Bloodlust. And because of that you can then not only look at Bloodlust as chronologically coming after this movie in universe but also in the real world, as you see how times have changed from 1985 to 2000, yet D is still the same. I don't know why but I find that really cool. In short, by watching this first i found an increased appreciate of Bloodlust and you might as well, but Bloodlust is also a great movie by itself.

I went into Vampire Hunter D with a lot of hopes. I’d heard about the film for years, and there are few things that get me excited then some weird-ass, edgy as balls vampire slaying action with some delightfully 80’s style. And whilst I got some delicious art and at least a bit of fun action, Vampire Hunter D fell way below my expectations, falling into a lot of the problems a lot of anime just seem to naturally have. First, I’ll start with the good stuff – generally, this film looks great. It’s opening scene, in particular was fantastic – the dark, grassy fields, the legendary reveal of Count Lee, and Doris slaughtering the monster attacking her horse. It’s all fantastic and set my expectations really high for the rest of the film. The general design of the film is really well made, even if it is peak 80s style. One section I really liked was D’s initial assault on Lee’s castle – we get to see a massive variety of monster designs that are honestly quite disgusting to look at, in the best way possible. Though, I have to talk about the elephant in the room – I think the fight scenes are honestly really poor. Like, really, really poor. I’ve got nothing but good things to say about the animation, which is draw-dead amazing at times, as expected from Madhouse. No, I just thinking the choreography and action of the fight scenes are awful. It felt like more then half of the ‘fight scenes’ are just shaking stills of D and other characters preparing attacks, whilst glowing speed lines backlight what feels like every scene in the film. Every fight feels like it’s over in mere moments and it honestly feels like we don’t get to see any really cool abilities in the entire film outside of a light that weakens Vampires and their kin. The story isn’t much better, but it’s at least serviceable. D has to help a young woman named Doris, who has been marked by the bite of the Vampire Count Lee, for the purpose of marriage. It plays out pretty much exactly how I’d expected. Additionally, I really like the setting, a weird fusion of medieval Europe mixed with science fiction interiors. It’s a little underused, but the interior of Lee’s castle is stunning in particular. Where I have greater problems is in the characters themselves. Sure, I don’t think I’m trying to expect any amazing writing out of any of the characters, but none of them sans D seem to have an interesting bone in their body. It felt like, by the end of the movie, the only character I gave two damns about was Rei, the mutant who serves Count Lee. I honestly felt bad for the guy getting screwed around by literally everyone in the movie. I had a lot of hopes for Doris to be a cool character, especially after the fantastic intro, but by about halfway through he movie she felt incapable for doing anything for herself. She literally just become something to protect, and someone to fall in love with someone at blatantly weird looking and unsettling as D. There was also a lot of… I don’t know, pointless sexualisation of her? I know this was the 80’s, but her outfit is utterly stupid. Like, why is she wearing half a skirt. Along with stuff like having her chest exposed for literally not reason for about three seconds, fully animated, it just felt like they did a massive disservice to what could have been a really cool character. On a better note, this being the 80’s, this film is brutal as all hell. Gore, brains and blood practically rain by the galleon, and it’s a sight to see. Vampire Hunter D isn’t a flat-out bad movie. It’s a movie I dislike, but I can totally see why it’s one people enjoy. But to me, it commits the cardinal sin of being flat out boring. I awaited the end with bated breath, not to see the thrilling conclusion, but to just get the whole experience over with. I do urge you, that if you enjoy vampires and crazy gore, you might really enjoy this movie, and I think it’s really up to you to decide if this is your kind of thing.

First off I do not like vampire stories. I just have a hard time buying into the idea of them. Sesame Street's "The Count" ruined it for me I think. That or Count Chocula.... But the idea is interesting.... Style dated... but there are other anime's of more interest. That is not to say I would refuse to see it with friends if they wanted to see it. Heck, at least its not a DBZ show!

(Check out my profile for a link to my site containing more up-to-date reviews and bonus media!) So I was unexpectedly a big fan of the 2000 Vampire Hunter D movie, which surprised me with its unique and highly atmospheric setting backed up by beautiful art and a heavy Gothic tone. It might've etched its way into my top five anime movies, and it became a given I'd have to see this one as I was desperate for anything more. My hopes weren't high thanks to the awful poster currently on MyAnimeList, but fortunately the movie has more things in common with what I liked about the 2000 movie than things that separate it. This 1985 adaptation of the novel series is distantly connected to the 2000 one due to the fact that Vampire Hunter D is basically an anthology series. I was initially worried about which to watch first, and now that I've seen both I can safely say it doesn't matter and that people are better off just jumping into the better movie (2000, no surprise there). 1985 Vampire Hunter D (hereby referred to as "1985 VHD") doesn't have more exposition or anything of the sort, and is maybe even slightly less descriptive of the setting. Vampire Hunter D takes place in a post-apocalyptic setting 10,000 years into the future and combines elements of Gothic horror, dark fantasy, and occult science. It's a warped, chaotic mix but takes itself dramatically and outside of its action scenes plays everything off with a cool sense of calm. Like said earlier, atmosphere is the key of both movies. 1985 VHD features the same captivating designs as 2000: various monsters, creatures, twisted castles, blood red moons, and advanced technology mixed into a regressive society akin to that of the Dark Ages in Europe. While the imagination of the world still runs through you with its various mysteries and surprises, it's less evocative in 1985 VHD due to its inferior stylistic rendering. 1985 VHD features brighter colors, less detailed stills, stiffer and more inconsistent animation quality, and lower production values all around. It is by no means a lazy work, just on a lower scale perhaps more necessary for its era and not as willing to indulge in the bleakness of the setting, as an 80s audience probably would've been as well. 1985 VHD is lacking a sense of beauty that 2000 VHD had. It's not as well directed and the images it conjures aren't as memorable. For dramatic effect a lot of simple techniques are used like mono color scenes, and the animation in general features a lot of solid, broad color strokes that lack the finer details of 2000 VHD that gave the world a sense of enveloping realism. It's a good example of how two things can share the same strengths and ideals but be so far apart in their goals because of how they're displayed. 1985 VHD is still worth watching for those same sensibilities, as those won over by 2000 VHD's world will enjoy seeing the additional context 1985 naturally gives. You see more of how average humans survive and learn more about D, and there's a bit more sci-fi used in the building designs. The story and writing themselves are a somewhat weaker this time around as well. This may just be an issue with the story chosen to adapt, but the side cast isn't nearly as memorable as the other hunters from 2000 VHD. There's a lack of mystery regarding the plot because it's so basic. A local vampire claims a human girl as his next bride, and she hires D to protect her, but the core story is as basic as that. The villain is generic and doesn't feature much, unlike 2000 VHD's which offers some sympathy and curiosity as to his relationship with his human victim. The action scenes suffer for the earlier simple reason of weaker art and animation, but the powers on display are less interesting as well. No real surprises like Grove, and the climactic battle is settled quickly and easily. The story's structure is rather odd too. While 2000 VHD was more of an adventure story that allowed the movie to show off more exotic locations and designs, 1985 VHD sticks to a smaller setting and alternates between a ranch, town, and castle. 2000 VHD also escalates better as D travels closer to his target, but 1985 VHD enters an awkward lull as D enters the castle for the first time early in the movie on a rescue and then returns 50 minutes later for a final confrontation. For an extended tour of a marvelously broad dark fantasy universe, going back to 1985 VHD is well worth the trip for big fans of the later movie, but it suffers in the ways you'd probably expect. At the same time, I'd like to restate that it wasn't as big a step back as I thought it would be. The things I loved about 2000 VHD were all still here albeit in a smaller dose. Given the fact that these are the only two existing anime of Vampire Hunter D, even watching this feels like a blessing and I was once again completely affectionate towards its aesthetic and tone. It's also worth mentioning that the dub was handled in 2015, and although it features different cast members than the great 2000 VHD dub, it's still professionally done with experienced actors.

Well to be honest this "classic" certainly dosen't live up to itself and i will explain why. Story: Your normal boring vampire story, vampire wants to kill me so I will get a vampire hunter eh boring. It mixes up things with the vampines but overall the story is very bland and boring Art: I didn't mark it down because it was old but because it is so dark and blue? Yes blue, I have to say sometimes it is hard to see anything as the screen is so dark. Music.......was there any as I didn't hear any. Character: practically no character development, the characters are pretty forgetful. If you are thinking of buying this for a fiver don't!! save that fiver for some good anime not this dribble.

My friend introduced me to Vampire Hunter D. Apparently this is some kind of classic, so I decided to check it out. He is a huge fan of this but I didn't even know that this movie existed in the first place. The art for this movie is pretty great especially for a 1985 film. Someone into today's anime may not enjoy this one though, but I'm used to the art style as I watched the old animes from the 80's before, like Ranma 1/2. The animation is very fluid, colors are nice to look at. Probably not the best art if you compared it to today's standards for anime. It also contains some nudity. ( Cover your eyes, children! ) I think what drew me in the most would be the story. It was very interesting to watch, and I could feel the horror and suspense as I watched it. Plot may be difficult to understand for some viewers or confusing, but I enjoyed how this movie focused a lot on the plot. I was able to understand it pretty well. I've never seen an anime with a story like this before, so I have to admit that I was pretty entertained. It contains sexual themes that may make viewers feel uncomfortable ( it did for me, I guess that adds onto the horror aspect ). The only part that's cliche about it is D and Dorris, other than that I think it's pretty original. They definitely should do better with the story telling though because it was a bit all over the place. This is probably the most flawed part in the movie. Many of the characters are one-dimensional. D has pretty unique abilities, and let's all admit that Dorris is your typical damsel in distress. All the characters are so damn flat and cliche. It just screams of FLAT. One thing that made me uncomfortable was how women were very sexualized in this movie. Everyone wants Dorris, eh? Most characters here are barely likable or relatable for the viewer. The music in this story is barely memorable. It's basically mediocre but not something I would sing to or think about when I see this anime. Voice acting is interesting, much different from today's anime. I think it's pretty good and refreshing to see how different voice acting was back then. Overall, I enjoyed the movie but I wouldn't rewatch it again. If you like horror with sexual themes and sci-fi, give it a try because you'll like it. I tell you this as a horror and sci-fi fan ( though I technically love every genre as long as the story is told well ). Hope my review actually helped people get an idea of the movie.

A thoroughly enjoyable movie from start to finish.A beatiful girl called Doris is biten by the count,a vampire over 10,000 years old who wants her as his wife,when all seems hopless a mysterious stranger riding on a horse appears.He is D,a half vampire ,half human{dunpeel}who is a vampire slayer.Now i know what your saying sounds cliche!! well the story although quite simple{which isnt a bad thing } entails some fantastic elements,such as awesome fight scenes with lots of blood and gore.The characters are also very well done with demons of varied abilities.The animation was nice,dated which some or most might not like but it didnt bother me.The character line-up for this movie is also quite good and realistic in their attitude.All-in-all a very entertaining show

If you read the book, and you're looking for a good adaptation, don't bother with this. The plot for this movie has been changed a lot from the book, and the art and music don't make up for it. If you haven't read the book (you should), then really, DON'T watch this. If you haven't already enjoyed the real story, this wouldn't even have the appeal of being loosely related to that. I highly recommend the second movie Bloodlust, as it captures the essence of the series much better, and is a better movie overall. The original movie is entirely skippable, as the second movie is quite self-contained.

For one of the classic anime movies, Vampire Hunter D looks more significant than it is. Visually, it impresses. The gothic art direction, bleak landscapes, and Yoshitaka Amano’s designs give it a striking, enduring identity. The atmosphere is strong throughout, capturing a lonely, decaying realm of blended science fiction and horror at its best. Unfortunately, the aesthetic outshines everything else. The writing is blunt, the dialogue often cringeworthy, and the mood inconsistent. The gothic horror story undermines itself with awkward pacing, abrupt tonal shifts, and moments of unintended comedy. Scenes intended for tension or tragedy land as absurd, with sudden deaths, exaggerated villainy, or poorly timed interruptions breaking immersion. The characters suffer the most from this. Doris’s sudden declaration of love feels completely unearned, the antagonists are more cartoonish than threatening, and even D himself is less like a legendary hunter and more like someone barely scraping through each meeting. Frankly, he seems weak. There are good ideas here, like immortality as decay or the burden of D’s twofold nature, but they’re delivered with little subtlety or buildup, leaving them feeling underdeveloped. Even the action sequences, while conceptually inventive, ultimately reinforce tonal inconsistencies. Creative creature designs and set pieces are offset by fights that lack clarity and impact, thereby muting tension rather than heightening it. The result is often a slide from threat to unintentional humour, adding to the film's mixed atmosphere. It’s also hard not to compare it to the sequel (Bloodlust), which polishes these same ideas into something considerably more coherent and emotionally effective. This original film ends up feeling like a rough prototype: visually memorable, occasionally compelling, but too clumsy in execution to fully work. You could argue this movie is worth watching for its historical and pictorial value, but it's difficult to take seriously as a complete film.